

Alexander Bradford joined chambers in October 2024 upon completing a specialist Business and Property pupillage under the supervision of Ali Tabari. Alexander’s practice encompasses all aspects of chambers’ Business and Property work.
Recent cases include:
With five years of legal experience across the Bar, at Pinsent Masons, boutique solicitors’ firms, and in-house roles at Barclays Bank and Sainsbury’s, Alexander has developed a versatile approach to legal problem-solving. Notable achievements include managing a regulatory and compliance project at Barclays and handling his own caseload of consumer disputes for major brands such as Sainsbury’s Supermarkets, Argos, Habitat and Nectar, often appearing in court as an advocate.
Alexander has delivered talks and seminars for the commercial, insolvency, and real estate groups.
His broad professional background is complemented by a commitment to pro bono work.
Alexander has built a robust practice in commercial litigation, representing clients in a variety of disputes across interim hearings and trials, as well as in advisory and drafting work.
Alexander has represented companies and individuals in business-to-business and business-to-consumer disputes in claims in contract, negligence, conversion, bailment and unjust enrichment, as well as statutory causes of action such as transactions defrauding creditors and unfair relationships. Alexander has also represented public bodies in commercial claims.
Drawing from his in-house roles including at Sainsbury’s, Alexander frequently provides advice and representation in consumer disputes. Alexander has particular experience of acting for universities in defending student litigation, including Ndaryiyumvire v Birmingham City University [2025] 10 WLUK 719, which began as a claim brought by a former student against a university for breach of contract and fraud. The claim was struck out with indemnity costs and wasted costs. Alexander can also advise on obtaining Civil Restraint Orders against vexatious litigants.
As well as his work as sole counsel, Alexander is equally at home being led as part of a larger team. In recent months Alexander has been led by Robert Mundy KC and Avtar Khangure KC.
Alexander is happy to provide advice and representation in relation to company and partnership disputes. Alexander often encounters and advises on issues of company law in his practice, such as the reflective loss principle and separate legal personality, directors’ duties, and piercing the corporate veil. Alexander has delivered talks and seminars on company and partnership law, including directors’ duties and the equitable doctrine of laches, the shareholder rule in company litigation.
Before coming to the Bar, Alexander provided hands-on assistance as a paralegal to a partner in a long-running, multi-jurisdictional partnership dispute in the High Court in London with leading counsel instructed on both sides, involving allegations of fraud, breaches of the Partnership Act, and unfair prejudice. Alexander also ran his own caseload of company restoration litigation in this role.
Outside of the Bar, Alexander sits as a director of a leaseholders’ management company that manages a residential development.
Alexander’s pupillage included specialist training in insolvency work. Alexander accepts instructions in corporate and personal insolvency matters, including applications to set aside statutory demands, winding up petitions, bankruptcy petitions, validation orders, applications to increase office-holder remuneration, applications to annul a bankruptcy, and other insolvency applications.
His experience includes Maher v Holmes [2026] EWHC 1337 (Ch), where he acted for the successful appellant debtor against a KC in an appeal against a bankruptcy order. The order was overturned after the High Court was persuaded to go behind a judgment debt.
Alexander has delivered or written various talks and articles on insolvency, including restructuring plans, appeals and other methods of challenging insolvency orders, individual voluntary arrangements, and practical tips for dealing with impecunious parties.
Other experience includes:
Alexander’s property practice encompasses a diverse range of cases, reflecting his growing expertise in this area. Alexander has experience of disputes over easements, nuisance, trespass, restrictive covenants, orders for sale, landlord and tenant obligations (including disrepair, dilapidations, and claims under the 1954 Act), boundaries, service charges, possession claims, telecommunications, and council tax and business rates.
Recent instructions include:
Alexander has delivered seminars on dilapidations and the meaning of a “notice” following Khan v D’Aubigny [2025] EWCA Civ 11.
Alexander also has gained experience of leaseholder rights and obligations and building safety matters through his directorship of a residents’ management company.
High Court sets aside bankruptcy order in Maher v Holmes
Abolition of Section 21 Evictions in the Renters’ Rights Act 2025: A Guide for Practitioners
Wasted costs awarded against firm of solicitors after AI-generated fictitious cases cited in court application (County Court) (external link)
When to Oppose or Consent to an Application for Relief From Sanctions: The “Litigator’s Dilemma”
Business & Property pupil on his feet
Alexander Bradford completes advocates pro bono pupil pledge
Scholarships and prizes: