We recognise that clients demand specialist knowledge from barristers who are technically astute, excellent in court and aware of wider commercial issues and personable.
Seeking advice or representation from a barrister or solicitor, particularly when a dispute has arisen, is nearly always stressful. In the context of wills and trusts where there is often a bereavement and an underlying family conflict, it can become especially stressful. This is not helped by the fact that the language and procedure of this area of law is hedged by unfamiliar concepts and arcane procedures. Indeed it has been said that to the modern mind, understanding probate law is like trying to decipher the muffled cry of a person standing on a distant hill.
At St Philips, we recognise the simple but often overlooked need to provide straightforward, practical and clear advice whatever the issue or dispute. Our Wills and Trusts team including contentious probate barristers has over 200 years of collective experience in providing advisory and litigation services relating to estates and trusts. This includes disputes as to the validity of wills, claims for financial provision from a deceased’s estate, advice as to the construction of wills and trust deeds, and claims for rectification. We also act in matters arising in the course of the administration of trusts and estates including actions to remove personal representatives and claims for breach of trust. We additionally provide tax planning and drafting services.
A cursory glance through the legal directories will reveal that from junior to senior we are highly regarded. Team members are described variously as being: an “approachable and strong advocate”, “excellent with clients”, a “Chancery mega-star” and having “a stupendous knowledge of the law”. Nonetheless, we recognise that disputes in this field are not about quotes in directories, or solely about our technical abilities; ultimately they are about real human problems. At St Philips therefore we seek to deploy our legal expertise to solve those problems efficiently, sympathetically and in a cost-effective manner.
Justin Luckman, Arron Snipe, Jake Smithers and Tom Kelly.
Moviebox Megastores (International) Limited, Oriental Start Agencies Limited, Moviebox (Birmingham) Limited v Mohammad Akram Rahi, Shazia Manzoor, Azeem Ud Din Qureshi [2023] EWHC 501 (Ch) https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2023/501.html Jonathan Gale appeared successfully...
In Re Portbond Ltd [2022] EWHC 3359 (Ch), three directors were accused by unfair prejudice petition of driving two companies into the ground and engineering a pre-pack sale to a...
Appearing before Mrs Justice Lambert, Raghav Trivedi was successful in having the appeal dismissed on all grounds of appeal on behalf of Simon Williamson. The appeal from the order of...
Judgment was handed down on Monday in Gill v Thind [2022] EWHC 2872 (Ch), a dispute over the ownership of three companies. After a three-week trial, Mr David Halpern KC, sitting as...
Mark Grant recently obtained an injunction against Persons Unknown, on behalf of the owners of the Three Counties Showground in Malvern, Worcestershire. The application related to a Defence and Security...
On October 13th James Morgan KC and Marc Brown presented a seminar entitled “The Duty to Creditors: BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA & Others [2022] UKSC 25”, this session...
Trespassers, Non-Residential Land, and the Police This article considers police powers in respect of trespassers under s 61 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (as recently amended)...
Yesterday, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana. The decision has been eagerly anticipated by the insolvency industry but understanding it will also be important...
St Philips Barristers John Randall QC and Ali Tabari have advised the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea in a major victory against social housing tenancy fraud. Under an order given by Mr Justice...
Lessons from Beasant v. Royal Commonwealth Society for the Blind [2022] EWHC 1319 (Ch.) an article by Gavin McLeod. Many wills give rise to what are thought to be ambiguities. A number of...
St Philips Barristers are regulated by the Bar Standards Board.
55 Temple Row
Birmingham
B2 5LS
0121 246 7000
DX 723240 Birmingham 56
29 Park Square
Leeds
LS1 2PQ
© 2023 St Philips Chambers. All Rights Reserved.
Bespoke web design made in London by Yellowball.
We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. We can also use it to analyse the behaviour of users in order to continuously improve the website for you.
View our Data Policy for further information.
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |