

Connor joined Chambers in 2024 following a specialist pupillage in employment, costs, and personal injury, under the supervision of Sofia Ashraf, Paul Wilson, and Sophie Garner. Connor has a busy multi-disciplinary practice across the civil courts and Employment Tribunals. Connor’s principal areas of practice include:
Testimonials:
“[I]t was clearly down to [his] forensic cross examination that we have our helpful findings on pay, holiday and contributory conduct”- Solicitor
“I do love [his] attention to detail” – Solicitor
“[Connor] is fantastic” – Lay Client
Before joining the Bar, Connor taught Employment Law and Commercial Law at Durham University, where he also completed his master’s thesis. He later gained further experience as a County Court advocate, acquiring substantial advocacy experience in interim hearings, contractual disputes, personal injury, and fixed costs disputes.
Connor particularly enjoys working with clients from an early stage to ensure the best possible outcome. He offers a detail-oriented approach to his cases, leaving no stone unturned.
Outside of his practice, Connor enjoys bouldering, cooking and expanding his vinyl record collection.
Connor prides himself on working closely with clients to ensure that the best outcome is achieved for their needs. He aims to provide bespoke solutions and detail-oriented advice and advocacy.
Connor has successfully advised and represented a broad range of claimants and respondents in the Employment Tribunal. Connor’s concurrent experience in the County Court and High Court makes him well-placed to assist in relation to multi-disciplinary disputes. He regularly represents clients in the Employment Tribunal and civil courts concerning issues surrounding personal injury, data protection, and contractual disputes. Connor also regularly represents clients in relation to allegations of non-employment discrimination and breaches of contract in the civil courts.
Connor’s recent Employment Tribunal cases include:
Connor has also recently appeared as the sole junior in the High Court in an employment-related Extended Civil Restraint application on behalf of six public-sector claimants, led by Elizabeth Hodgetts.
Connor has acted for and advised clients in industries such as nursing, pharmacies, social care, education and higher-education, banking, and logistics, among others. Connor represents clients with respect to roles of all seniorities, including, recently, a Chief Operating Officer.
He has experience in issues spanning:
Connor is increasingly instructed to act on behalf of Trade Unions in employment disputes. Connor is versed in the goals and needs of Trade Unions, including the merits of litigation for the benefit of all Union members. He is pleased to advise and represent Trade Unions in strategic litigation in the Employment Tribunal and beyond.
Examples of Connor’s recent cases include:
Connor is an affiliate member of the Association of Costs Lawyers. He accepts instructions across the full range of specialist costs disputes. During his pupillage, Connor gained specialist experience in costs disputes in the County Court and the Employment Tribunal. He was involved in detailed assessment proceedings, costs applications, and other disputes arising from points of law.
Connor’s experience includes:
Connor has a busy courtroom practice and routinely advises and appears for clients in primary proceedings and related costs applications, in addition to costs-only disputes. For example, Connor’s recent cases have included:
Previously, during his time as a paralegal, Connor assisted with an appeal to the Court of Appeal concerning the rights of beneficiaries of a will to challenge solicitors’ fees.
More broadly, Connor advises and represents clients in commercial matters arising out of contracts, data protection, nuisance and negligence.
Connor regularly advises and represents claimants and defendants in the County Court. He has a range of experience, including psychiatric injury arising from data breaches, workplace stress, occupiers’ liability, RTA and Credit Hire matters, and disputes that fall (or would have fallen) within the EL/PL and RTA protocols. He is at-home in personal injury disputes concerning fraud and Fundamental Dishonesty.
Connor’s recent cases include a Multi-Track case concerning an allegation of abuse by a protected party with dementia. Connor represented the claimant, whose life had been shortened as a result of the abuse. Connor has also recently acted for the claimant in a Multi-Track employers’ liability dispute that arose from a crush injury to her hand.
Connor has a growing clinical negligence practice, and is happy to consider conditional fee arrangements. During pupillage, Connor gained experience in drafting and advocacy arising out of clinical negligence disputes, and is particularly familiar with the nuances of clinical negligence litigation involving private practitioners. Connor has recently advised on, and appeared unled for the Claimant in a dental negligence dispute concerning the avoidable loss of all of the Claimant’s natural teeth.
In addition to personal injury work, Connor also undertakes cases arising from torts that do not necessarily involve physical injury. His experience in this area includes:
BPC, University of Law: Outstanding; top of class.
Master of Jurisprudence (by research), University of Durham: Pass Without Corrections
LLB (Hons), Law, University of Durham: 2:1
Gray’s Inn Lord Justice Holt Scholarship (BPTC)
University of Law, Birmingham: BPC Best Overall Student
Connor Wright successfully defends respondent in complex five day claim in the employment tribunal
St Philips’ Injury Update- part 6
On Demand Webinar- Navigating and disputing fixed costs in Personal Injury Litigation
On Demand Webinar- Stress at work claims in the Civil Courts
On Demand Webinar- Dental negligence claims – an area on the move
St Philips’ Injury Update- part 4
St Philips’ Injury Update- part 3
Connor Wright successfully represented the respondent in 6 day Employment tribunal
Connor Wright completes Advocate’s Pro Bono Pupil Pledge
Practical takeaways from the Supreme Court’s decision in Oakwood Solicitors v Menzies [2024] UKSC 34
The Use and Abuse of Subject Access Requests in Civil Litigation