An employment specialist with complementary expertise at the complex interface of employment and commercial contractual dispute resolution, Alex is one of the most active employment barristers on the circuit. Clients come to Alex, in part, because of his all-round capability in the employment arena, as well as the measured, thorough and reassuring way in which he works. Alex also maintains a particularly lively advisory practice and is, quite increasingly, sought out on some of the most esoteric and complicated points of employment law, especially amid the ongoing global pandemic.
Comfortable in the appellate courts, and with several recent appearances before the EAT, High Court, and Court of Appeal, Alex’s robust and precise style of advocacy leaves no stone unturned, whilst also leading to practical and pragmatic results. Alex shines in matters requiring a deep analytical assessment of the prevailing issues and laws, and has the rare ability to boil down the most complex of issues into plain and easy-to-digest points, as well as provide his clients with viable, feasible and pragmatic options in the context of a litigation or dispute.
Aside from a thriving employment and wider commercial practice, Alex also has a personal interest in law practised across different jurisdictions, and the intersection of law and where different legal systems conflict. To that extent, he has a growing cross-border practice, which Alex’s global clients or UK-based clients with international operations particularly value. Alex brings a wealth of wider understanding and experience from a distinguished background in international relations and also in humanitarian work. Prior to becoming a barrister, Alex worked for the Permanent Delegation of Japan to the OECD – one of the world’s largest economic and development think tanks. A keen advocate against discrimination, Alex also worked an advocacy advisor for the AIDS Law Unit of the Legal Assistance Centre in Windhoek, Namibia, visited a Syrian refugee camp in northern Greece, and liaised with a legal NGO in Bangalore (India) working on building understanding between the judiciary and sex workers vulnerable to exploitation.
Alex intentionally maintains an evenly balanced Claimant and Respondent practice, which he finds often leads to practical and tactical advantages at the negotiating table and in respect of case analysis. Alex’s clients come from a range of industries and sectors, each valuing Alex’ versatile ability to drill down into the salient issues quickly and effectively. In recent years, he has acted for major global financial institutions, world-leading retailers, one of the UK’s most high-profile elite automotive manufacturers and various local authorities. Alex is also accredited to accept Direct Access instructions from members of the public and recently appeared in a highly complex employment case in the engineering sector involving consideration of South Korean and Mozambican jurisdictional points.
Well-established in the employment arena, Alex maintains an all-round practice and is regularly instructed in cases concerning all forms of discrimination, whistleblowing, all forms of dismissal, TUPE, holiday pay issues and working time issues. Alex also has a growing practice involving cases at the interface of employment and contract law and is regularly instructed in cases concerning restrictive covenants and breach of contract. Across all areas, Alex particularly shines in cases involving cross-border issues.
A snapshot of Alex’s extensive employment experience includes:
- representing the Claimant in an important and widely-reported Court of Appeal decision (in the Claimant’s favour) dealing with the proper application of the TUPE ‘sole or principal reason’ test Hare Wines Ltd v Kaur & Anor  EWCA Civ 216. The judgment has significant implications for employers handling transfers of employees. Alex had also represented the Claimant at first instance and in the EAT, winning at each stage. His lines of argument in resisting the employer’s appeal were in line with the final determination of the issue;
- representing the Appellant in a High Court reconsideration of a Head Teacher’s fitness to practise following on from the Supreme Court decision in Reilly v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council  UKSC 16, which considered the Supreme Court’s judgment regarding the interaction of a professional body’s requirement for a teacher to be a fit and proper person and the law of unfair dismissal (Caroline Reilly v Teaching Regulation Agency and Secretary of State for Education (2020) EWHC 1188 (Admin);
- representing the Claimant in a successful pregnancy discrimination and unfair dismissal case against ‘one of Nottingham’s best-known lawyers’, Bhatia Best solicitors in a case that gained considerable attention in the local media, for example here in People Management, and here in the Nottingham Post;
- advising a London-based tech company on High Court injunction proceedings and restraint of trade where a former Belgian employer sought to enforce a restrictive covenant. The matter involved consideration of both the applicable law and the proper forum for a foreign contract of employment;
- advising the Claimant, a Partner in a London law firm, in a high-value victimization and unfair dismissal claim that was reported in the international legal media, for example here; and
- representing the Respondent bank in a successful defence against allegations of disability discrimination, as reported here.
- Representing the Claimant in a high-profile successful discrimination claim against a major national health club that was comprehensively covered by the national media – for example:
Commercial Dispute Resolution
Alex’s complementary commercial dispute resolution practice is well established in its own right. Over the course of several years, Alex has been involved in cases dealing with possession, breach of directors’ duties, wrongful trading, High Court winding up petitions, County Court litigation over the terms of a lease, and mortgage applications, director’s misfeasance/breach of duty in an insolvency context and concerning commercial leasehold agreements.
Further, often directly connected to his employment practice, Alex has experience of dealing with the interrelated and overlapping issues at play in the hybrid area of commercial/employment law. These include restrictive covenants, company insolvency and the transfer of undertakings. In the latter, Alex has appeared (and succeeded) for the respondent to an EAT (and then Court of Appeal) appeal against a transfer of undertakings dismissal. The case has been widely reported as a guide to the modern law of TUPE.
Working with Alex
Clients regularly comment that Alex ‘gives his all’ to cases and is a committed, dedicated specialist to call upon. Alex is known for his measured and reasonable approach, which means that he can balance the competing pressures in even the most protracted and exhaustively pursued cases to open up avenues to pragmatic and sensible results. Alex’s professional clients particularly value his ability to stay objective and to accurately forecast a result early on in a dispute; he anticipates how a case will be perceived by a judge. In court or tribunal; his cross-examination efficiently exploits the weaknesses in the other side’s case.
Aside from his expertise on the advocacy and advisory side, Alex also brings a wealth of commercial awareness to his clients, in part due to his extensive experience in practice and in part due to a rounded, international background prior to becoming a barrister. Alex’s clients comment that his perspective and pragmatism often unlock even the most difficult of issues and problems. As a consequence of that international background, Alex is fluent in French and Italian and a lifelong student of several other languages, both Asian and European. He is able to use this multicultural awareness and facility in communication to augment his practice, where needed.
Appointments and Memberships
Employment Lawyers Association
The Honourable Society of Lincoln’s Inn