Wendy Miller

Call: 2001


Wendy is often commended for her level of judgement, meticulous preparation and steadfast approach to her cases.

She demonstrates a high level of professionalism and client care to those who instruct her and she is instructed in a wide range of criminal cases by the prosecution and defence including: attempted murder, serious sexual offences, violent offences, benefit fraud, tax evasion, child cruelty, firearms offences, fraud, drug importation and conspiracy.

She is a highly experienced and effective advocate and has considerable experience in dealing with vulnerable witnesses and defendants with mental health problems. A substantial part of her practice has been in both current and historic serious sexual offences and she is experienced in cases involving the use of intermediaries and cross examining vulnerable complainants including very young children.

Wendy is a grade 3 prosecutor.

Recent Cases:

  • R v K – prosecuted by Queens Counsel – Defendant was one of 5 who administered a campaign of grievous bodily harm upon a step daughter within the family unit. Defendant (aunt) suffered mental health issues.
  • R v V – Represented the defendant who was one of four in a family responsible for the false imprisonment and brutal attacks upon a mother and daughter over a three week period.  Defendant suffered with paranoid schizophrenia.
  • R v A – Junior in attempted murder by strangulation. Defendant (16 years old) and victim, both complainant and defendant in a psychiatric hospital. Defendant unfit to plead – issues over whether the defendant “did the acts” as opposed to a matter of intention.
  • R v P – Represented defendant charged with attempted murder of a grave digger resulting in multiple head wounds – forensic scientific evidence of dna analysis and facial mapping.
  • R v T – Child cruelty – 6 week old baby suffered a contusional cleft to the left frontal lobe (brain injury), a fractured femur, and suspected cerebral palsy. There were many issues in the case concerning causation. Whether the injuries were related to a birth injury, shaking, and deliberate twisting or impact injury – Complex issues in order to deal with cross examination of experts. After two years of expert opinion and legal argument the defendant was acquitted.
  • R v R – Knife point robbery of 82 year old woman in her own home. Complex cross examination of the complainant due to her age and amnesia.
  • R v C – Gun point robbery in an off licence (5 year old child present) – intricate technical assessment of cell site analysis.

My Expertise