The broad focuses of Anthony’s practice are property litigation and landlord and tenant disputes, with professional negligence and partnership claims undertaken in that context.
Anthony appears regularly in the higher courts, but has broad experience in the County Court (where he also sits as a Recorder) and in references to the Adjudicator of HM Land Registry (where he also sits as a Deputy Adjudicator). In property litigation recent highlights have been Court of Appeal cases regarding boundaries and adverse possession, and High Court proceedings on matters as diverse as enforcing a solicitors undertaking in respect of a mortgage and construing the terms of a contract of sale.
Landlord and tenant work can be equally varied, with High Court cases dealing with the installation of beer flow monitoring equipment, the terms of a business renewal, and the consequences of forfeiture and surrender. The value of these cases can run from millions of pounds (the operation of a break clause in offices at Heathrow) down to the desire to preserve one’s home (the loss of part of a front garden): Anthony recognises that every case is important to the litigants.
Some cases can be very urgent, like the expulsion of protesting students from an unsuitable building to the keeping open of a market for its traders when strike action threatens. A willingness to commit at short notice to getting the desired result is essential in such matters. When property deals and relationships go wrong, litigants often look for a party at fault, and Anthony has a specialist professional negligence practice dealing primarily with matters like conveyancing errors, the missing of break options and the procuring of ineffective property insurance. The holding of property by partners can also generate specialist work with particular problems.
Anthony is always keen to establish a strong rapport with profession clients (who include surveyors and other property professionals as well as solicitors) and with lay clients. In many cases, site views are essential and he is a willing traveller.
Qualifications and Appointments:
- ADR Group Accredited mediator
- D.Phil (Oxon)
- Dip Law (City)
- BA Hons (Dunelm) 1st
- Recorder (Civil) 2009
- Deputy Adjudicator to HM Land Registry 2008
- Lawyer Chairman in Residential Property Tribunal Service 2006
- Examiner of the Court 2004
- Member of Birmingham Law Society Property and Development Committee
- Recorder (Private Family) 2013
- Tribunal Judge, First Tier Tribunal, Property Chamber (Land Registration and Residential Property divisions) 2013
What the Directories say:
- “He’s always thoroughly prepared and has meticulously read through the papers. No matter how big the file is he will know it inside out.”, “He’s very client-focused and has a calm and personable approach.”, “Possibly one of the most approachable barristers in practice.” and”Clients really warm to him. He is knowledgeable and has great technical expertise.” – Chambers UK 2019
- “A highly incisive barrister.” – Legal 500 2019
- “Widely lauded for the depth of his knowledge of property law. He acts in a variety of cases ranging from leasehold disputes to possession claims and allegations of professional negligence.”,
- “Pragmatic, level-headed, flexible, available and very responsive to issues that arise.” and “He is technically first-rate and has an excellent manner.” – Chambers and Partners 2018
- “He has a “can-do” attitude and seeks practical solutions to difficult problems.” Legal 500 2017
- “He thinks outside the box and looks at novel approaches.” “Extremely bright, down-to-earth and great with clients.” – Chambers UK 2017
- “Highly technically competent, practical and decisive.” – Legal 500 2016
- “His preparation of cases for hearing is extremely diligent.” – Legal 500 2015
- “What he doesn’t know about property law isn’t worth knowing.” – Chambers UK 2016
- “A very thorough and knowledgeable advocate. He is easy to work with and has delivered very well for us in everything.” – Chambers UK 2016
An esteemed practitioner who attracts enviable praise for his impressive technical know-how as well as his top-class communication skills. He covers a substantial amount of real property work, including boundaries, rights of way and restrictive covenants. Expertise: “He is a superb communicator who gets on top of the most complicated briefs very quickly.” Chambers UK 2015
- “Extremely knowledgeable and experienced” (Legal 500, Midland Circuit, Property, Leading Juniors)”
Chambers and Partners 2014 describes Anthony as, “a shrewd operator who looks after his clients well.”
The Chambers UK 2013 edition stated, that the “extremely impressive” Anthony Verduyn is “very down-to-earth and develops a very easy rapport with clients.” Interviewees appreciate that he is “not afraid of getting his hands dirty.”
Anthony’s recent experience includes successful appellate cases concerning:
- The proper interpretation of extrinsic evidence relating to registered land, in particular the survey conducted on behalf of HM Land Registry: Durden v Aston  EWCA Civ 636.
- The introduction of newly acquired evidence at appeal in justification of a retrial: Balevents v Sartori  EWCA Civ 1508.
It also includes significant cases at first instance:
- Committal of Landlord and Company Director in case concerning failure to insure commercial property: Monopro Ltd v Central Hall Developments Ltd  EWHC 1509 (TCC)
- The power of local authority market operator to terminate licences: R. (on the application of Aryubi) v Birmingham City Council  EWHC 1972 (Admin)
- The power of landlords to install beer flow monitoring equipment in leasehold properties: Unique Pub Properties v (1) Broad Green Tavern Ltd (2) Dempsey  EWHC 2154 (Ch);  2 P&CR 17.
- Proceedings to determine whether a headlease was forfeited or surrendered, essential to the security of tenure of an underlessee renting a car park at £200k per year.
- An action under Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 to determine whether the terms of a renewal had been compromised or were at large.
- Urgent injunctive relief to protect university facilities from sit ins (University of Birmingham v Persons Unknown in 2011) and to keep open markets for trading (Birmingham (Wholesale) Fresh Produce Association v Birmingham City Council in 2011).
Recent cases include considering lease provisions in respect of a development with “Sick Building Syndrome”, achieving a settlement of a Land Registry indemnity case for a six-figure sum and a trial before a High Court judge of issues relating to boundaries and adverse possession in the Cotswolds (Harrison v Brading  EWHC 3267 (Ch))
- Bryant Homes Ltd v Stein Management Ltd EWHC 2435 (Ch);  1 P. & C.R. 6: Restrictive covenants and money payment obligations
- Unique Pub Properties v (1) Broad Green Tavern Ltd (2) Dempsey  EWHC 2154 (Ch);  2 P&CR 17 – Construction of lease and beer flow monitoring
- Wickens v Cheval Property Developments Ltd  EWHC 2249 (Ch);  1 P. & C.R. DG9 – Obligations and passing of risk in fixtures and fittings in contract for the sale of land
- Balevents v Sartori  EWHC 2437 (Ch);  All ER (D) 148 (Sep) – Adverse possession and fiduciary duties
- Brooker v Unique Pub Properties Ltd  EWHC 2599 (Ch);  3 E.G.L.R. 59;  49 E.G. 72 – Lease renewal and valuing licensed premises
- Hyett v Stanley  EWCA Civ 942;  1 F.L.R. 394;  3 F.C.R. 253;  W.T.L.R. 1269;  Fam. Law 23 – Constructive trusts and proprietary estoppel
- Stafford Borough Council v Haynes  EWCA Civ 159;  H.L.R. 46 – Committal in social housing context
CV Added Successfully!
Would you like to continue adding to your brochure or go to the Brochure Builder to begin the download?Go to Brochure Builder Continue